By Prerna
Gopal, (Sr. Program Officer, The Antara Foundation)
A few years ago, I met a worried husband. To the outside world, Shyam* was
a provider, a village headman, and perhaps the embodiment of all things
masculine. But to me, on the warm, summer day he was a helpless man seeking
answers. His wife, Geeta*, had been recently diagnosed with severe
anemia while she was carrying their twin babies. They had been running
around from hospital to hospital trying to figure out what “anemia” means and
what they could do to protect their unborn children. Wherever they would go to
get answers, Geeta would be rushed into a different room while Shyam would wait
outside hoping that someone would explain to him what was going on. They were
met with the words “Agli baar apni saas ko lana. Bring your mother
in-law next time” and each time, Shyam would feel a little more
helpless. During our conversation, Shyam couldn’t hold his anxiety in and
regurgitated all his worries hoping that maybe I could help him out. As I
slowly explained to him what was going on, I could see his eyes well up. He
quietly muttered “I am the father. Why didn’t they just explain this to
me? Do you know how worried I have been?” That day, I
realized the inherent bias that exists in the system. Maternal and child
health (MCH) is so often considered a women’s agenda that we forget about those
who make women mothers and children equally alive.
There is evidence
from all over the world that explains the importance of involving fathers and
husbands as allies in MCH solutions [Note 1, 2]. For
instance, our deeply patriarchal society hands most of the power to them. They
often influence access to healthcare for their families and thus, are often
thought of as perpetrators. That is not to say that in many cases this might be
true, however, our inherent bias often clouds our judgement. I have first-hand
met men like Shyam who want to help, who can help, and who are lost in the
myriad of social pressure, standing isolated from their family unable to bridge
the chasm of misunderstanding.
But how should we
bridge this gap? The first step is recognizing and acknowledging these men and
viewing them as a part of a couple. Next, we invest in their knowledge. They
can act as powerful allies in our quest for an equal world. In parallel, we
need to build systems and structures where couples feel safe and can work
together with their service providers. Lastly, we must provide opportunities to
the couple to exercise their joint decision-making. There are programs from
around the world where couple-based interventions have shown remarkable
improvement in MCH outcomes [Note 3, 4]. I strongly believe
that there are many allies in our communities who want to contribute and
participate in our noble quest to protect women and children. But just like
Shyam they are lost. Empowering them to make the right decisions for themselves
and their loved ones. If can achieve this, we would be building our society as
a truly egalitarian system.
* Names are
changed for anonymity
Note 1: Tokhi, Mariam, et al. "Involving
men to improve maternal and newborn health: a systematic review of the
effectiveness of interventions." PloS one 13.1 (2018): e0191620.
Note 2: Comrie-Thomson, Liz, et al.
"Challenging gender inequity through male involvement in maternal and
newborn health: critical assessment of an emerging evidence base."
Culture, health & sexuality 17.sup2 (2015): 177-189.
Note 3: Doyle, Kate, et al.
"Gender-transformative Bandebereho couples’ intervention to promote male
engagement in reproductive and maternal health and violence prevention in
Rwanda: Findings from a randomized controlled trial." PloS one 13.4
(2018): e0192756.
Note 4: Shefner-Rogers, Corinne L., and
Suruchi Sood. "Involving husbands in safe motherhood: effects of the SUAMI
SIAGA campaign in Indonesia." Journal of health communication 9.3 (2004):
233-258.
Disclaimer: The article has been written in personal capacity, and the views
and opinions expressed are those of the author
Comments
Post a Comment